O emprego (des)controlado de agrotóxicos na releitura das interfaces dos direitos ambiental e do consumidor e o alto nível de proteção pelo Macrobem

Abstract

The present dissertation focuses on the consumption of pesticides during large-scale food production and its contemporization by current legal dogmatics, with the aim of revealing the protection of the macro-good as an interface that interconnects environmental and consumer rights, in order to to achieve a higher level of intergenerational right protection based on sustainable consumption. In this sense, we proceeded, at first, to re-read the dichotomous position between control versus lack of control in the use of pesticides, requiring two chapters to retrieve facts and information. In the first, a critical historical approach to the use of pesticides and its association with the Green Revolution and Agribusiness was contemplated. In the second, initially focused on the harmful impacts of pesticides on the environment and consumers, it culminated in an approach dedicated to alternatives to the consumption of agricultural pesticides. After overcoming the dichotomy, progress was made in identifying the protection of the macro-good as the apex of the research, the result of the interaction between consumer and nvironmental rights, in order to serve as a new standard for current dogmatics, especially the jurisprudential field, raising the level of protection for the new generations through the revisited adoption of the sustainable consumption paradigm. It should be noted that the present work did not seek to exhaust the application and implementation of the macro-good resulting from the joint application of environmental law and consumer law, but it is believed to have been possible to reveal it as a new potential hermeneutic for this discussion, whose principle information already proves to be essential, and the other tools for the application and evolution of this new interpretation will require more studies and breath for that. The present research used the method of ontological legal hermeneutics, which presents itself as closer to the ideal indicated to overcome and reinterpret the established Law, tied to tail decisions, in new perspectives of language based on the fusion of horizons. [resumo fornecido pelo autor]