Docência e qualidade de vida em tempos de pandemia/pós-pandemia: uma análise nas trilhas da biopolítica na contemporaneidade no Município de Touros/RN

Abstract

This dissertation is a quali-quantitative study on "Teaching and quality of life in times of pandemic/post-pandemic: an analysis on the tracks of biopolitics in the Town of Touros/RN". The problem to be workedon applies to the general objective of this research, which aims to analyze the possible relationship between quality of life in teaching among education professionals in the municipality of Touros/RN, in times of pandemic/post-pandemic, seeking to present alternatives that can contribute to school daily life. The methodological procedure is characterized as field research, descriptive, with a phenomenological method, classified as basic research by its nature, and a quanti-qualitative approach. The study took place in three school units of the municipal education system, with classroom teachers from 6th to 9th grade of Elementary II. Twenty-six WHOQOL-bref questionnaires were applied, and six semi-structured interviews were conducted with questions based on the Walton Model (1973). As a theoretical reference, the following were oriented: Quality of life in the integral conception of the human condition by Limongi-France (2007); Human Resources Management by Chiavenato (2009); Conceptualization of health and state of well- being by Dejours (2009); Looks, practices and educational processes are referred to the research Freire (2005); Nóvoa (1999); Libâneo (2011); Tardif and Lessard (2008); and Biopolitics in the idea of Foucault (2008). For data analysis, descriptive statistics elements were used: Frequency, Mean, Mode and Standard Deviation. The results presented as to the WHOQOL?bref Questionnaire, higher prevalence for satisfied, referring to the unimodal response, highlight for the General Domain, with 59.62 (Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Health), and the lowest highlight for the Environment Domain, with 38.46 (Physical Safety and Protection; Home Environment; Financial Resources; Health and Social Care: Availability and Quality; Opportunity to acquire new information and skills; Participation and opportunities in recreation or leisure; Physical Environment; and Transportation), with Standard Deviation of greater dispersion ± 0.244 for the Psychological Domain, and presenting more homogeneous result for the Social Relationships Domain, ± 0.059. Highlighting attention in the results for little satisfaction among the items, in the Physical Domain for pain and discomfort with 30.77%, in the Psychological Domain for spirituality, religion and/or personal beliefs with 65.38%, in the Environment Domain for opportunity to acquire new information and skills 69.23%, financial resources 38.46% and physical environment 34.62%. When comparing the two instruments (WHOQOL-bref Questionnaire and the Semi-structured Interview (Walton 1973), greater approximations were observed for the Physical Domain (Facet 18 - Capacity to work, with Dimension II (Working conditions) with a percentage of 7.12%. There was greater disparity between the Social Relationships Domain and Dimension VII (Work and total living space) with a difference of 39.59%. It is concluded that faculty members are dissatisfied regarding physical safety, protection, home environment, financial, health care, opportunity for new information, opportunities in recreation or leisure; physical environment and transportation. [resumo fornecido pelo autor]